Probabilistic Methods for Algorithmic Discrete Mathematics, A hard problem that is almost always easy. Algorithms and Computations, Statistical Mechanics in Optimization Problems.
Probabilistic Analysis of Graph Algorithms. Computational Graph Theory, Merrick L. Furst and Ravi Kannan.
Information Processing Letters 28 :1, Journal of Soviet Mathematics 39 :1, Combinatorica 7 :3, Journal of Statistical Physics 48 , Random Graphs of Small Order. Annals of Operations Research 1 :3, Journal of Algorithms 5 :2, Information Processing Letters 17 :3, Lifschitz and B. It may take up to minutes before you receive it. The file will be sent to your Kindle account. It may takes up to minutes before you received it. Please note you've to add our NEW email km bookmail. Read more. Post a Review.
You can write a book review and share your experiences. Other readers will always be interested in your opinion of the books you've read. The values of c were chosen such that e - e - c was 0. These values of c are given approximately in the top of the table. All probabilities are rounded to 3 decimal places. The remaining entries were completed using relation 3.
In 4 the t e r m with k 3 5 could be neglected. Table 2a shows the d fference e-I'-- P,,. It can be seen that the easily computed value e-" is usually a very good approximation to P,. I n fact this is not so, as can be seen by comparing Tables Ib and 2b with Tables l a and 2a.
Amigo Academic Portal |
In order to shorten the calculation, only the large ternis in the sums were used, since the binomial coctfic'ents would otherwise take too long to evaluate. The values up to I? We shall show now that this I S the cabe in the entiie range ofp. Lot 0 U. Boiiobds, A. I00 SO9. I 16 , H37 , I05 , I05 I SO4 , I02 , I06 , I03 -. Table 3 The probability of Gn. I 1 , I03 , SO7 SO6. SO3 , , C, is a forcst.
C, and iii 1. In this case a. G , is such that 58 B. This impl'es that a. Let us consider two cases according to the size of p. This probability space was defined in [ BoIlobLs, A.
For example, having selected a blue G, or G,, , we could have defined a sequence of coloured graphs H o , HI, Suppose we have defined Hi. Another possibility is to add s independent green edges to G,, each being incident with precisely one vertcx of dcgree less than k. In yet another variant, for each x i of degree less than k we can choose k--d x, random edges incident with xi. All one wants from these essentially equivalent models is that Lernina 2 should be true and the space 9 n , p ; 3 k should not be far from g n, p , in particular, that we should have a firm grip on the probabilities in the new space, in the vein of our next lemma.
G, E 9 n ,p ; 2 k has the following properties. The asscrtions i n i follow from the fact that a x.
The expected numbcr of vertices of degree k - l! The expected number of vertices of G,, having degree k-l! G, every green edge is incident with a vertex of degree at least 4 log IZ. G, provided a. Clearly this is the case if Q is the property of being k-connected. The next result shows that a. By Lemma 2 all wehaveto prove is that a. Let us estimate the probability that K G , -log n For -log n. This can be proved by imitating the proof or Theorem 1 for the appropriate model.
This inloriuation I S g,ven in the remaining columns. Matchings Complete matchings in random graphs were studied in great detail by Erdos and Renyi , , Our first aim is to pr-ove an analogue of Theorem 4 for matchings in bipartite graphs. To formulate the result prccraely we need soiiie delinitions.
Finally, write nzutciz for the property of containing a complete matching. I I Theorem 5. Uollobas [7, pp.
Tfornason 64 I Lemma 6. Suppose G has no isolated vertex and it does not have a complete matching. As G does not have a complete matcliing, Hall's condition is violated by some set A c V i , i. Choose a set A of smallest cardinality satisfying Then i and ii hold since otherwise A could be replaced by a proper subset of itself. What is the probability that the subgraph of G spanned by A , v A , has at least 2a-2 edges and no vertex of A l is joined to a vertex in V, - A,? G, has a matching covering all but at most one of the vertices.
Thus if n is even then a. G, has a complete matching. Our aim is to show that this is true for much smaller probabilities. Supposc a x. G, has a matching covering all but at most one of the vertices of degree at least 1. At least how large is p? Y, uncovered. It is easily seen that if alniost G, contains such a configuration of six vertices then. We shall need two simple lemmas. Lemma 7. Thomason Proof. Lemma 8. Theorem 9. Let A be the event that G fails to have a matching covering all but at most one of its vertices of non-zero degree. Thomason 68 The proof of Theorem 9 was somewhat cumbersome because we had to consider graphs with only about 4 4 log n edges.
As we know, about twice as many edges are needed to make it likely that a random graph has no isolated vertices. I n that range the proof would have been considerably simpler, as would a direct proof of the following immediate consequence of Theorem 9. C,hnsa I-jirctor. The obvious obstruction to a complete matching is the existence of three vertices, two of which have degree 1 and are joined to the third; for brevity in Tables 6 and 7 such a configuration is called a star.
Tables S and 9 are about graphs of order At each stage, if there were vertices of degree I, we took the edge incident with a vertex of degree 1 and deleted both vertices from thegraph.
Most frequently terms
Ifevery non-isolated vertex was incident with at least 2 edges, we picked one of the edges at random and deleted both vertices. Having come to an end, we recorded the number of edges missing from a perfect matching in the middle third of the tables and used alternating chains to extend it to a matching. The last third of the tables shows how long the chains were which we had to use to extend our inatching to a complete matching, providcd the graph did contain n complete matching.
Hamilton cycles Mucheffort has been put into the study of Hamilton cycles in random graphs.
Theorem Denote by Ham the property of containing a Hamilton cycle. When searching for a Hamilton cycle, the lollipop algorithm see Thomason [Sl] was found useless and we had to do an exhaustive search. It is somewhat surprising that the probability that the hitting times coincide does not seem to increase fast.